$show=search

1959 claim is wrong, but it punctures China’s theory: Experts

SHARE:

China is attempting to justify its salami-slicing tactics by referring to the 1959 claim line, another senior Army officer added on condition.

Indian Army ladakh
Indian Army Deployed In Ladakh 

 

China’s reference to a 1959 definition of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) that was never accepted by India highlights Beijing’s reluctance to disengage, experts and senior army officer said, adding that the claim has also served to puncture the country’s claim that it did not transgress into Indian territory in the Galwan valley in eastern Ladakh.


“India doesn’t recognise the 1959 claim line. However, even as per the Chinese interpretation of the 1959 line, the LAC runs through Patrolling Point 14 in Galwan valley. But the June 15 skirmish took place 800 metres west of their own claim line. Their intention is to grab territory,” a senior Indian Army officer tracking the situation along the LAC said on condition of anonymity.


China’s assertion that it abides by the Line of Actual Control (LAC) as proposed by Premier Zhou Enlai to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru (who rejected it) in 1959 has complicated the border row . By bringing up the 1959 LAC, China is just hardening its position and making a resolution even more difficult, said former Northern Army commander Lieutenant General DS Hooda (retd).


Beijing’s position, made known in an exclusive statement to Hindustan Times amid the ongoing border friction in eastern Ladakh, is a reiteration of the long-existing differences on the boundary question and a sign that the ongoing military standoff is unlikely to be resolved soon.


“India has never accepted the 1959 LAC. Not at the time it was brought up in 1959, not after the 1962 war when it was referred to in the unilateral ceasefire announced by China, or at any time after that. By referring to this, they seem to indicate that disengagement is unlikely,” Hooda added.


China is attempting to justify its salami-slicing tactics by referring to the 1959 claim line, another senior Army officer added on condition of anonymity. Salami slicing refers to a string of small, clandestine operations meant to achieve a larger goal that would be difficult to accomplish in one go.


The two serving officers said the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) had gone beyond its own so-called claims of 1959 in the Galwan valley and triggered a deadly skirmish there on June 15 resulting in 20 Indian and an unspecified number of Chinese deaths.


Outnumbered Indian troops inflicted heavy casualties on the Chinese in the seven-hour deadly conflict near PP-14 in Galwan valley.


Also Read: Post Ladakh, PLA no longer a bogey for Indian Army


“The PLA claim has shifted to Nala junction or Y-junction where Galwan river meets the Shyok, which is 800 metres on the Indian side of China’s claim of 1959. In April 2020, the PLA objected to the construction of a bridge at the mouth of Galwan. This area was never contested and that’s why face-offs never took place here,” the first officer said, holding the PLA responsible for the brutal skirmish.


“I don’t think there is any great clarity about the 1959 LAC. We do have some idea about their 1960 claim line, but a claim line does not automatically translate into the LAC,” Hooda said.


“Over a period of the last 60 years, both countries have consolidated their hold over their own sides of the LAC. Areas where there are differing perceptions are also clearly known. This should form the basis for any negotiations and not some vague and undefined LAC that existed in 1959 when physical control by both sides was tenuous,” Hooda added.

Source>>

COMMENTS

Name

Afghanistan,3,Al-Qaeda,1,Andaman & Nicobar Islands,1,Anti-radiation Missiles,1,Anti-tank Missiles,1,Arabian Sea,1,Armenia,6,Armenia-Azerbaijan War,5,Army Commanders,1,Artificial intelligence,1,Arunachal Pradesh,5,Atal Tunnel,2,Australia,5,Azerbaijan,6,Beirut,2,BEML,1,Bhutan,1,BrahMos,3,BRO,2,BSF,2,CAPF,1,China,71,Chushul,1,CRPF,5,D.R.D.O.,12,Daily Knowledge Dose,3,Darwan Singh Negi,1,Defence,5,DF-17 Ballistic Missile,1,Drones,1,FATF,1,FBI,1,Festivals,2,Fighter Jets,1,Fitness,4,France,3,Gabar Singh Negi,1,Germany,1,Global,2,Golden Arrows Squadron,4,Gulf,1,HAL,2,India,170,India-China Stand-Off,41,Indian Air Force,38,Indian Air Force Day 2020,3,Indian Army,153,Indian Coast Guard,2,Indian Defence News,243,Indian Defence Review,12,Indian Navy,19,INS Kora,1,INS Sahyadri,1,INS Viraat,1,Insha Jan,1,Inspiration,7,Iran,2,ISI,2,Israel,3,ISRO,3,ITBP,5,Jaish-e-Mohammed,3,Jammu & Kashmir,34,Japan,4,KALI Secret Weapon,2,Kavkaz 2020,1,Kiren Rijuju,1,Konark Corps,1,Kulbhusan Jadhav,1,Kulgam,2,LAC,24,Ladakh,9,Ladakh Face-Off,40,Lashkar-e-Taiba,4,Lebanon,1,Leh-Manali,2,LoC,7,Masood Azhar,2,MEA,11,MiG-21,1,Mirage-2000,1,MoD,1,MQ-9B Drone,1,Myanmar,3,Narendra Modi,2,NASA,2,NDA,3,Nepal,2,NIA,5,Northern Command,1,Nowshera,2,OFB,1,Opinions,14,Optical Fibre,1,Ordnance,1,Pakistan,30,Pentagon,1,Pinaka Rocket Launcher,1,PLA,4,PoJK,2,Poonch,3,Pulwama,3,Pulwama terror attack,4,Qatar,2,R K S Bhadauria,1,Rafale,10,Raise 2020,1,Rajasthan,1,Rajnath Singh,12,Rajouri,3,Rudram,2,Russia,4,Rustom-2,1,S Jaishankar,10,SAARC,1,Self-help,1,Shaurya Missile,1,Shivangi Singh,2,Shopian,3,Siachen Glacier,3,Social activist & reformers,2,South China Sea,2,Southern Command,1,Space,4,Sri Lanka,1,Srinagar-Leh,1,Stealth Destroyer,1,Switzerland,1,Taiwan,5,Taliban,1,Technology,13,Tibet,1,TPCL,1,Turkey,2,UAE,2,Ukraine,1,United Nations,2,US,21,Victoria Cross,2,War Heroes,2,Weapons,9,World,131,World War 1,1,Xi Jinping,1,
ltr
item
Defence News, Indian Defence News, IDRW, Indian Armed Forces: 1959 claim is wrong, but it punctures China’s theory: Experts
1959 claim is wrong, but it punctures China’s theory: Experts
China is attempting to justify its salami-slicing tactics by referring to the 1959 claim line, another senior Army officer added on condition.
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-50yWGTpejFc/X2gi7Ft_cQI/AAAAAAAAAWQ/EXy3PxjpZQQtlzBITyBuS82rPf7bSpOLwCPcBGAYYCw/w640-h346/women-army-2.webp
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-50yWGTpejFc/X2gi7Ft_cQI/AAAAAAAAAWQ/EXy3PxjpZQQtlzBITyBuS82rPf7bSpOLwCPcBGAYYCw/s72-w640-c-h346/women-army-2.webp
Defence News, Indian Defence News, IDRW, Indian Armed Forces
https://www.theindianhawk.com/2020/09/1959-claim-is-wrong-but-it-punctures-china-s-theory.html
https://www.theindianhawk.com/
https://www.theindianhawk.com/
https://www.theindianhawk.com/2020/09/1959-claim-is-wrong-but-it-punctures-china-s-theory.html
true
161742447869945643
UTF-8
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share to a social network STEP 2: Click the link on your social network Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy Table of Content